The Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (CPED) significantly reshaped the landscape of doctoral education in the field of education. Launched in 1986, this ambitious initiative aimed to transform the EdD from a research-focused degree mirroring the PhD to a practice-oriented doctorate designed to prepare educational leaders for impactful roles within schools and systems. This article delves into the project's goals, impact, and lasting legacy, addressing common questions surrounding its influence on modern educational leadership.
What was the Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate's main goal?
The central goal of CPED was to create a distinct and relevant EdD degree that addressed the pressing need for highly skilled educational leaders. Prior to CPED, the EdD often mirrored the PhD, emphasizing theoretical research over practical application. CPED proponents argued that this model failed to adequately prepare individuals for the complex challenges of leading schools and districts. Their vision was a doctorate that combined rigorous scholarship with practical experience, equipping graduates with the skills and knowledge to effect meaningful change within educational settings. This involved a shift away from purely theoretical research towards action research, emphasizing problem-solving and the implementation of evidence-based practices within real-world contexts.
What are the key features of the Carnegie model for the EdD?
The Carnegie model for the EdD emphasized several key features, which have become defining characteristics of many contemporary EdD programs:
- Emphasis on practice: The core focus shifted to preparing educational leaders for practical application in diverse educational settings.
- Action research: Action research became a central component, encouraging candidates to identify real-world problems, design interventions, and evaluate their effectiveness within their own contexts.
- Collaboration and mentorship: The program design often incorporates collaborative learning environments and strong mentorship relationships with experienced practitioners.
- Cohort model: Many programs adopted a cohort model, fostering strong bonds among students and creating a supportive learning community.
- Reduced emphasis on dissertation length: While a substantial capstone project remains crucial, the emphasis shifted away from lengthy, theoretical dissertations to more concise, practice-oriented projects that directly address real-world issues.
How has the Carnegie Project influenced EdD programs today?
The influence of CPED is undeniable. Many EdD programs across the globe have adopted key elements of the Carnegie model, such as an emphasis on practical application, action research, and collaborative learning. The focus on preparing educational leaders equipped to handle the complex demands of today's schools is a direct legacy of the project. While the specifics vary across institutions, the core principles of preparing practitioners to be reflective scholars and change agents remains a vital part of modern EdD programs.
What are the criticisms of the Carnegie Project?
Despite its significant influence, the Carnegie Project has faced some criticisms. Some argue that the emphasis on practice may have diluted the scholarly rigor of the EdD, while others contend that the action research component may lack the generalizability of traditional quantitative research methods. There’s also ongoing debate on the ideal balance between theory and practice in preparing educational leaders. However, these criticisms often underscore the ongoing evolution and refinement of the EdD and the ongoing need to adapt educational leadership preparation to meet the ever-changing needs of the field.
What is the difference between a PhD and an EdD?
The key distinction lies in the intended outcome. A PhD typically emphasizes original theoretical research contributing to the broader field of knowledge. The EdD, informed by CPED's influence, centers on improving practice and solving problems within educational settings. While both require rigorous scholarship, the EdD is more closely tied to practical application and leadership development.
The Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate was a pivotal moment in the history of educational leadership preparation. Its lasting impact continues to shape the landscape of doctoral programs and the development of skilled educational leaders. While debates regarding the ideal balance between theory and practice persist, CPED undeniably elevated the importance of practical application and problem-solving in preparing individuals to lead and improve educational systems.
